Ethan Mollick· @emollick · X·· 3 天前
事实摘要
Ethan Mollick 引用一项研究称，在覆盖统计分析、形式模型与定性工作的 124 篇哈佛社会科学论文评审中，Opus 4.8 在各项指标上均胜过人类专家评审。他据此提出，学术界需要尽快思考如何让科学研究实践适应 AI。
正文 · 原文
By every measure, Opus 4.8 beats human experts as peer reviewers in a study of 124 Harvard social science papers covering a range from statistical analyses to formal models to qualitative work.
As academics, we need to figure out how to adapt the practice of science to AI, fast.
来源：Ethan Mollick · x.com